Vertical integration will scupper compatibility

Dear Sir,

I can see the appeal of vertical integration for large manufacturers. Not only do they get the order for the whole job, it reduces costs and technical development can be co-ordinated a lot more easily. There might even be some bene t to the user inasmuch as if anything goes wrong, there is just one manufacturer to call.

However, we all know that real savings in energy will only come from intelligent switching and dimming by using technologies such as daylight controls, movement sensors and illuminance detectors.

My worry is that the vertically integrated manufacturers will have no incentive to make their control systems compatible with others. A facilities manager might want a particular control system for the lighting so it can be integrated with the building management system. Similarly, the designer might want a particular driver or ballast for its technical characteristics or build quality.

Vertical integration will make life dif cult for small and medium sized manufacturers because their equipment will need to integrate with proprietary systems.

Do we really want every single piece of lighting equipment in a building to be supplied by just one manufacturer?

Alan Tulla
Alan Tulla Lighting

Can ethical audits be credible?

Dear Sir,

Today’s UK/European lighting business would not survive without supplies from ‘the developing world’ – but the problem of verifying the ethical audits of factories is contentious, and has recently been highlighted in the press, including The Guardian.

The need for a lighting review

Dear Sir,
We need to change the way that we assess project costs.